Are journalists at threat of being replaced by robot’s?

AI J.jpg

Image Source:

There was an article published in The Guardian titled, “Written out of the story: the robots capable of making the news”.  The article goes into detail on how, Fan Hui, a three-time champion of the east Asian board game, Go, lost to a computer programme that was created by Googles subsidiary, DeepMind. The article suggests that even journalists aren’t safe from the possibility of being replaced by machines. There have been many advancements in terms of computer programming, and the example relating to Fan Hui shows just how advanced AI has become in terms of logic and outsmarting the human mind.  Matthew Jenkin, the individual behind the article writes that maybe in time, AI may be able to perform more creative tasks, possibly posing as a threat to the future of journalists.

Does such a threat already exist? Wordsmith, an artificial writer created by the company Automated Insights, of which is based in North Carolina. Wordsmith cherry-picks words from a dataset and uses them to structure articles. Per the article in The Guardian, in 2015, the company claims to have created more than 1.5 billion pieces of content, up from 300 million in 2013. Also, per this article, there are already some high-profile customers who already use this AI, companies such as Associated Press and Gannet. Gannet publishes USA Today and Yahoo News.

However, there was an article published by the BBC, where Slate’s, Will Oremus states, “”Quakebot neatly illustrates the present limitations of automated journalism,” he writes. “It can’t assess the damage on the ground, can’t interview experts, and can’t discern the relative newsworthiness of various aspects of the story.” This gives us an indication as to the limitations of machines within the journalism sector. One of the benefits of the machine reporter is the ability to produce content in a matter of seconds through the collection of words from a dataset, however as Will Oremus states, these machines can’t assess the damage on the ground, interview experts or analyse a story and decide what is perhaps newsworthy.



The Risks of Photojournalism


Image Source:


There are many photojournalists who put their lives on the line to capture major events happening around the world, from Robert Capa to Kevin Carter.

Robert Capa had lost his life on the 25th May 1954 after stepping on a landmine while he was capturing photographs, identifying the brutality of war.

Kevin Carter, who was also a photojournalist lost his life through suicide, as he was plagued by the horrors that he had witnessed throughout his short lived career. One of his most famous images that was taken by Carter is probably the image of The Vulture and the Little Girl. The image depicts a young girl wasting away, and behind her stands a vulture who is waiting for its next meal.

Photojournalists, take pictures of events or situations from all around the world for them to be published or broadcast in order to tell a news story. Some photo journalists even go so far as to put their lives on the line to relay information back to the rest of the world.

Another example of a photojournalist who got killed by doing his job is James Foley. Foley was 40 years of age when he had lost his life. He was targeted and executed by the Islamic state. James Foley usually reported instances from the front line, broadcasting the realities of war.

Everyday, journalists are out there risking their lives to shed some light on the brutality and misgivings of the world, if it were not for these individuals that are out there risking their lives we would not have as much information about what is going on around us as we do. A quote that supports this is “Photojournalism is hazardous. It’s not for the fainthearted or those unwilling to risk personal danger. Reporting what happens in the world puts photographers on the edge of constant disaster.” (1994, pp. 313)

There are people out there who are risking their lives every day and are not credited. Journalism in modern days has been viewed under a bad light due to instances such as the phone hacking scandal, but let us not forget about the individuals that are out there in the world, living on the brink of disaster, to keep us informed on the dark realities that surround us.

Other Sources: 

Chapnick, Howard. (1994, pp. 313) Truth Needs No Ally: Inside Photojournalism: Chapter 22

How is fake news affecting REAL journalism?


Image Source:

On the 27th November 2016 an article was published by the BBC, the heading of that article Facebook, Fake News and the Meaning of Truth.

The article goes on to say how the most important source for news today is not a newspaper or broadcasting, but the very popular social networking site that is Facebook. Over 1 billion people log onto Facebook daily, in May of 2016, data was gathered and showed on average that 44% of American’s get news from social media.

Fake news is at the centre of the media recently, The Guardian more recently released an article stating how fake news may have played a part in the American election. Not only is this affecting American politics but an article posted by the BBC on the 13th January 2017 goes on to say how the labour party feel that fake news poses as a threat to British politics.

Fake news is not only affecting politics but it is affecting people personally. An article posted on the 12th January 2017 by the BBC goes on to tell the story of how a Syrian migrant had been falsely linked to terrorism due to fake news that had circulated Facebook.  According to the article there have been numerous instances and false allegations made against migrants and refugees on the social networking site.

On the 15th November 2016 an article was published on the BBC by someone who writes and distributes the fake news. The individual goes on to say how he thinks people are entertained by his style of news and often after reading the title do not proceed to check the actual contents of the article before sharing.

The BBC are now taking matters into their own hands and have recently set up a team to debunk fake news stories.

The effects of fake news are not only felt on a personal level but when involving the government and politics can affect everything on a much wider scale.